Thursday, May 17, 2012

Before We Demand That Apology


It’s been about two weeks and half since President Obama came out with his conviction regarding homosexual marriage and the firestorm continues. Most of the responses fell along predictable lines and there’s little doubt that the debate will continue right up through November’s presidential election. Of particular concern is the response and position of the ‘black’ church to the president. Will church going blacks stick with him even though they may disagree on so fundamental an issue, or will they in righteous defiance declare that the word of God is clear, it cannot be changed and thus Mr. President while we appreciate your historic accomplishment we just cannot in good conscience cast our vote for you a second time? It was already a long forgone conclusion that most white evangelicals were not going to vote for President Obama even if he had stated his unequivocal support for marriage between a man and women.

What’s of interest is how this may be the first time in a very long while that the traditional black bible believing church and the white evangelical church see a political issue eye to eye. How wonderful might it be to see these two groups who claim to believe in the same Lord, sing many of the same songs, hold to the same moral convictions finally walking arm in arm (metaphorically of course) to the polls to cast a vote for the moral values upon which America was founded. Except for one small problem.

In our rush to decry this latest attack on God, country, traditional family values and marriage we’ve forgotten that we were the first to twist the Scriptures and tribablize the living God to feed the lust of our idolatry. While we may vehemently disagree with President Obama’s stand on this issue and recoil at his (and others) use of Scripture to inform that stand, it is the bible-believing Christian church that just may have provided the foundational thinking that led to his conviction.

From its very beginning, the evangelical church in America twisted, misused and disregarded Scripture to suit our wants and pursue our own selfish agenda. For example, the incident between Noah and his grandson Canaan recorded in Genesis 9 was used to justify the perpetual enslavement of Africans for the benefit of those who enslaved them and others who profited from it. This was the case made by Prof. Robert L. Dabney D.D. in his publication A Defense of Virginia (and through Her of the South (1867). It is a weighty thing to look another human being in the eye, a man created in the image of God and for whom Christ shed His blood to redeem and tell him that the reason the enslaver can use his labor, have sex with his wife and sell his children is because God made him to be a slave. But that’s exactly what the church did when we told ourselves, those enslaved and the country that the American form of perpetual, ethnically based slavery was God’s express will and thus any argument or attempt to say otherwise or end the system was an act against the living God.

Had it ended with slavery the church might have been able to repent and investigate how we let our idolatry overrule God’s word so that it wouldn’t happen again.  But it did not. Nearly one hundred years later the evangelical church that authoritatively declared that the American system of ethnically based, perpetual slavery was the unquestioned will of the living God with equal authority and conviction told ourselves, the nation and the world that strict segregation along ethnic lines which included prohibitions against inter-racial marriage was also the will of God, taught in Scripture and thus must be obeyed. Once again the church prized our own well being and privilege ahead of the truth of God’s word. And once again our decision had disastrous consequences for our witness. Having sided with the culture against the living God the evangelical church was bound to practice what they preached by refusing membership to black people which extended to barring them from participating in the Lord’s Supper. This was a striking and I must say frightening violation of Paul’s teaching on communion recorded in 1 Cor. 11. Here Paul addresses and rebukes those who fostered divisions in the church and used our sacred communion meal to do so! Once again the church followed the lead of an ungodly culture, told them it was perfectly in line with God’s will and exchanged God’s clear truth to worship the cultural idol of white supremacy.

And the beat as they say goes on. The same black church that we’re told must now rise to reject President Obama for the sake of the biblical truth about marriage has for at least a couple of decades bowed, embraced and promoted the idol of prosperity, greatness, comfort and ease all in Jesus name and all because God commands us to do so in His word. The examples of this kind of twisted theology and brazen idolatry are so numerous that I’m sure you can think of many yourselves. How can we with a straight face and clear conscience demand an apology and retraction from President Obama when for years we’ve peddled a blatant lie and will stand before God’s people this Lord’s Day to emphatically declare that the gospel we preach is a gospel of prosperity in the Name of our Lord who said ‘Watch out! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed; a man’s life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions.” (Luke 12:15 NIV).

What ought we to do then? Perhaps we should begin with repentance for how we’ve misused Scripture to further the goals of our own idolatry and thus laid an example for those who seek to do the same. Whether we like it or not, there is no substantive difference between the homosexual who is certain that his sexual orientation is God’s will to that of the segregationist who was equally convinced that God’s will mandated forbidding blacks to join communion, to that of the prosperity pastor who with the same confidence declares that it is God’s express will that all of His people enjoy material prosperity.

Until and unless the church unwraps the American flag from our identity and mission and rejects the heresy of prosperity theology the world will continue to view us not as a people standing up for an objective truth that is foundational to our society but simply repeating the sins of our fathers for the sake of our own well-being.

To Him Who Loves Us…
Pastor Lance

Saturday, May 12, 2012

OK, I WANT TO SAY SOMETHING ABOUT PRESIDENT OBAMA TOO.

   Along with many conservative Christians, and other adherents of traditional marriage, and let me also add a description of myself as a vehement opponent of the practice of homosexuality and someone who sees it as immoral, and destructive to individuals and our society as a whole (did you figure out where I am coming from?), I am appalled at our President expressing his support for same sex marriage.  I am also not at all surprised at his stand, just dismayed and appalled.  Since he is our President I expect moral leadership from him, and not that which takes us as a  nation to greater immorality.
   Unlike many of his opponents I really like Barack Obama, and I love the model of his family life.  I think he is smart, a pretty good leader, and someone who usually means what he says and sticks with it.  When he says he will end a war in Iraq, he does it.  When he says "I will go into Pakistan and get Osama Bin Laden", he does it.  When he decides he will take on Wall Street, the Republicans over health care, and corporate America in taking apart General Motors and putting it back together, he does it.  The man has guts, he is a player, and has the ego to back his play.  My point is not that I like his decisions, at least not all of them, but that he does make them in spite of opposition and that takes courage.
   I say all this because I find those who are cynical about his decisions tend to suggest that he makes them only for political purposes.  I grant that he is a politician, and an exceptionally cunning and adept one, but just like Bill Clinton, he has convictions and follows through on them.  He may choose his moments to lower the hammer, but he does have convictions.  In the case of homosexual marriage he holds reprehensible and disgusting convictions.  Oh my, how the world has changed, that such a scandal can now be haled as a historic moment.
    I pray for the President faithfully.  I think he has a sense of the Gospel, compared with the lack of such from many former presidents.  What he lacks though is a Biblical World and Life view, and what he has in its place is a sense of justice without any absolute foundations that control its boundaries.  In short, he can claim to be a Christian and totally be opposed to the holiness of God, the dignity of human beings, and the moral order that creates a moral society all while thinking he is doing something noble and has the comfort of personal faith.
    I don't make fun of our President, I respect the office highly.  I don't send mocking stories about him on Facebook, or videos of his verbal stumbles, and certainly not racist and demeaning comments about him to anyone.  I don't attempt to subvert our system of government by attempting to delegitmize his government by calling it a "regime."  Trying to make a clown of our President doesn't help us to understand the terrible dilemma we are in as a country.
    It is not that this man is evil, or a socialist, or simply an opportunist.  What is distressing is that he understands the culture and society from the perspective of the American Academy, the intellectual secularists, the adrift inheritors of a Christian culture no longer in touch with its moorings.  He gets America, and where he thinks it is going, and that is bad news for America because it ain't going any place healthy.  I don't want to be a troglodyte, I am not whimsical for a racist past, or a past of general poverty.  I am thankful for all the progress we have made in freedom, in technology, and in our material wealth, but brokenhearted that we have forgotten what got us here and fairly certain that the peak will be reached soon where we begin to slide down the other side.
   It was one thing when Bill Clinton used the Oval Office for personal sexual immorality, what a terrible example to our children.  Then he lied about it.  Wow, but I think this is worse, because it is an endorsement of a chosen behavior that though present for much of history has always been condemned as immoral, especially in the contribution to the delinquency of minors (who are now encouraged to use their sexual confusion as a breakout of identity [what trash}) and allows individuals to pursue sexual fulfillment without sexual responsibility by the fulfillment of (normal but fraught with difficulty) relationships with the opposite sex and the production and raising of children.
    This President is helping society to stand on its head.  Bullying is now a sought after behavior so as to identify those who mock the homosexual, and to protect those who would pursue it.  Am I in favor of bullying, of course not, but it is all part of an agenda of protection for a self-destroying, self-confusing, and self-agonizing way of life.   I prophesy bullying, where the homosexuals stand at the door of Lot's house, and demand that the young men be sent out.  This is no persecuted minority, but a self indulgent materialistic and politically savy group of folks who will destroy our nation, if not by its eventual corruption, then by a God who knows how to send the smoke.
     With every love and kindness to anyone caught up in homosexual behavior, and my respect to you as someone created in the image of God, and my hope for God's deliverance for you, I stand opposed to any agenda that would normalize such behavior or seek to expand it.  I ask all who agree with me to speak out, stand up, stand out, and shake off all the name calling that will come your way.  For the sake of our nation, for the sake of our children, for the sake of Truth, this must be opposed.
     

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

COMMUNITY

   Recently I have been in the process of packing up my house in preparation for a move.  This has caused me to get over my procrastinating ways of leaving piles of paper, cards, letters, etc to gather on my desk.  Now I have had to decide what to toss and what to keep.  It gave me some pause to realize that I had a stack of sympathy cards from the death of my mother this year, and I felt a bit guilty in having to discard them.  There were a lot of them and as I read the messages and names of those who sent condolences and messages of love and sympathy I was struck by how many people loved my mom, and have loved me.
    Would I be disrespectful of my mom to throw them out?   Would I be wrong to throw such thoughtfulness in the recycle bin?   How could I keep the feelings, the good words, the connections that these cards represented?
    To some degree I feel like a hypocrite in receiving such letters and cards, since I am so terrible in not sending them to my friends in their grief and distress.  I don't think I knew how much they could mean to someone.  I am glad that I did not think of anyone who was missing, or make a list in my head of folks that I felt should have said something but failed to write.  I know many did hurt for us, and prayed for us, so I am grateful to them even if they could not or did not write, but the letters were a blessing.  I was surprised that some folks who know me but with whom I am not that close took the time to let me know they cared.
   I still had to let the letters go, and only kept a couple, one with a picture of my mom when she was younger, one a dramatic statement of the resurrection.  I was glad I opened them up again especially since one had cash in it that I had forgotten about.  What will linger is the impression of love, and the reality that we do live in community.  The reality of community is that people do actually notice you, and want to know about you and what you are doing, and your losses move them and your victories encourage them.
   I think this is something young people don't realize until much later in their lives, that the folks they grew up around, and the older people who watched them grow feel a sense of ownership.  So many of us when we are young are cavalier about the investment others make in us, even to our parents.  We can move away so easily, get caught up in our own lives and stop communicating.  We forget where we came from, and sometimes we even resent questions and accuse people of being nosy (okay, some people are nosy) when the truth is that they are interested in us and want to stay connected.
    I have watched children grow up in my family, and in my church.  I have seen some keep that sense of connection, and I have seen others who give nothing back and would be amazed that someone thought they should.  I think for some of us, when we were young, all our achievements were our own.  It is what we did and it had nothing to do with the platform that launched us.  There are some stories like that, of folks who made it in spite of where they came from, but I think most often is because of where and of whom we came.
    There is of course a healthy parting, a need for the young to leave the nest and make it on their own.  Yet death has a way of bringing things back to the reality that permanent "good-byes" make us more appreciative of "hellos."  It at least sometimes makes us realize people see the drama we are caught up in, and they empathize with us, and the knowledge of that is worth a lot on days when you don't think your life means that much, or that anyone cares.  They do, and we should, because the caring of others sure heals the heart when you remember what you have lost.
    So when some old lady or old man asks you how you have been, or where you have been and what is going on in your life, tell them.  At least thank them for asking, maybe even ask about their situation.  Hold on to the connection, through the years if you can.  People are important even if they haven't done anything directly for us, and maybe we don't know what they've done.  Maybe they prayed for us, maybe they defended our name when we weren't around, maybe they just hoped our potential would someday be realized.  Maybe they just sent a note and it made you take notice that they noticed.  Thanks, by the way, for the card.

Monday, April 23, 2012

BLESSED TO HAVE KNOWN HIM!

I want to say my little piece about someone I admired very much.  Charles Colson has gone on to glory and I am very glad for the few moments the Lord gave me to be in his company, to be inspired by him, and to serve the Lord with him in Prison Fellowship.
    In the late seventies, after Chuck had started the ministry of PF, I was asked to come to a in-prison seminar.  Evidently this was the second one PF was attempting and things were moving fast in the relationship with the Federal Prison system.  Their first in-prison seminar at Oxford, Wisconsin was a success, and they realized that they would need to build a stable of speakers and teachers who could go under their auspices into the prisons.  This forced Chuck to trust the few preachers he knew to help him select some others they felt might be effective in prison.  I am not sure why they asked me, except that some may have thought prison was were I belonged, but I was happy and excited to be asked.
    I remember flying up to Sandstone, MN and spending a short week in that prison.  The reaction of the inmates was awesome, and I found that often to be the case.  The PF seminars allowed a whole group of volunteers to come in, as well as those of us who supplied most of the teaching.  The men and women who were incarcerated celebrated that week, and the fellowship and love between those of us from the outside, and those on the inside, was real and intense.  It was something of an adrenaline rush emotionally, and leaving those folks became hard to do.  Leaving prison was easy, and a relief, but leaving them behind was hard.
    Several times in the few years I was able to work for PF I had the privilege of being with Chuck.  Michael Cromartie would whisper in his ear as he approached me to remind him of who I was, and he always made me feel as if were akin to a preacher rock star.  I remember visiting death row with Chuck in Georgia, and the guards took us into the death chamber.  As we stood around the chair, Chuck decided to discuss the death penalty with me.  This was no mere intellectual discussion.  The men we had just left were a few meters away, and this was where they were headed.  He wanted to know what I thought because he really wanted to get it right, he wanted to stand where the Bible and Jesus told him to stand, he wanted to stand in the right place for the right thing.  Neither of us thought it was easy to figure it out.
   In a strange turn of events, after I had left the U.S. to be a missionary in Kenya for a few years, I was made the temporary head of Prison Fellowship International, Africa.  This allowed me to work for PF in various African countries, go to the International Conference in Northern Ireland, and get caught up in African church politics, which didn't turn out too well for me.
    I relished the fellowship of some of the men I taught with in PF,  George Soltau, Steve Smallman, Carl Ellis, and then a growing group of ex-cons, or graduates of in-prison seminars, who came on staff with PF.  These were some of the coolest people, with the wildest stories, who had experienced grace in amazing ways.
    "A bruised weed I will not break, and a smoldering wick I will not snuff out," the theme verse from Isaiah for PF was absolutely what the ministry was about.  This is God's tender hand to those who have failed, who are not just broken but sometimes disgusting.  If you have never been disgusted with yourself I don't know if you can get down on the floor and wash Jesus feet with your hair.  He who has been forgiven much, loves much.  This is what I experienced in those times when we worshiped inside prison walls, at Angola, at Marion, at Stillwater, Menard.  In places like Zambia, Botswana, and all over Kenya.  To meet volunteers as varied as nuns and priests and Mennonites, and Calvinists all loving on inmates, pointing them to Jesus, hoping for them to find in Him a Savior and deliverer.  It is humbling to meet a man who has spent all his adult life in prison and be told it is the best thing that ever happened to him, because it was there he met Christ.
    I had to make a choice between my other commitments; my local church, the Army Chaplaincy, and my family, and I couldn't continue to keep up the pace.  But I learned one thing, and that was the Charles Colson was for real, and if ever there has been an American/Christian hero in my lifetime it was him.  Even if he had to have someone remind him of who I was he had the ability to make people feel important, and that he cared about them, even as he cared about big ideas too.
    He may have had more friends in prison than he did on the outside, but wherever his friends were and are, we were blessed to know him.

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

All The Rage

By now much has been said and heard regarding the killing of Trayvon Martin. Add to that the thousands upon thousands of facebook postings and it’s pretty clear that his tragic death has struck a chord with many. But why some may ask? Why the furor and fervor over a single death (as unfortunate as it may be) when as we all know far too many black men die violently in America each and every day?

While I can’t delve into all the issues that surround this incident I did want to help provide at least some insight into why so many feel so strongly about it. To begin with the man (George Zimmerman) who shot Trayvon was not a police officer and though he apparently patrolled this neighborhood on a regular basis he also was not a registered member of the neighborhood watch. He began to follow (in his truck) the teen because in his mind Trayvon was a suspicious character. (we’ll get to that in a bit). According to 911 tapes he called he police to report his activity and was explicitly told to refrain from following Trayvon. Not only did he ignore this but soon afterwards got out of his vehicle, confronted Trayvon and during the confrontation fired the fatal shot into the teens chest.

What has outraged so many is that despite all this Zimmerman was not arrested or apparently even detained for in depth questioning. Nor did it seem that the police department had any intention of so doing. How is it that a police dispatcher could tell him to stop following Trayvon and then after getting a call that a shot had been fired and the boy was now dead not at least tell his parents that they were launching a full investigation?

Why the outrage? I believe there are two main reasons both impacted by the collective history and present experience of most black people in America.

American history is filled with tragedies of black men dying at the hands of white men with impunity. While it certainly doesn’t happen nearly as frequently as it once did, the killing of Trayvon (I can’t say that it was murder yet, since all the pertinent fact aren’t in) brings back all too painful memories for almost every black family in America. Beyond that I must be straightforward and say that there have been so many instances of violence against black men by police that many African-Americans sense that law enforcement is at the least less than enthusiastic when a black person is killed by a white person. Thus when Trayvon was killed and his parents couldn’t seem to get any real answers from the police, their very real grief turned to anger which at first spread through their family and friends and then the wider black community. (Of course this is not to ignore that many, many white were also outraged, I’m just merely trying to explain the core of the outrage expressed by many black based in our historical context) The feeling was ‘here we go again, a black man dies at the hands of a white man who goes scott free and all we’re left with is our grief, pain and anger.

Regarding our present experience once more I must say that all too many blacks (especially black men) have had negative and from our viewpoint unnecessary confrontations with not only the police but other whites because we are black. For example, there was the time from my teens when I along with two other friends were stopped by the police while walking home from a bowling alley. We had chosen that particular venue since it was near my high school and I was familiar with it from intramural bowling. However at that time the neighborhood was almost exclusively Jewish and Italian. So though we weren’t bothering anyone (we had decided to walk home instead of take the bus) the police felt for some reason to pull in front of us, question what we were doing and demand some kind of identification before we were allowed to proceed home. And dear ones this is the type of incident faced by most all African-American men in this country. Now, does this mean that all of my interactions with the police have been negative? No, actually I pleased to say that I’ve had some quite positive interactions with the police and most every white person with whom I come into contact. Yet, with that said I must admit that myself, my son and most all African-American men have had enough negative experiences to prevent us and the wider black community from ruling out completely the reality that race still plays a part in how we’re viewed and treated by some people in America.

In my view, it’s these two factors that sparked the rage and sense of injustice so many feel about this case. Given the historical context and present experience it’s not hard for me to believe that Mr. Zimmerman chose to follow Trayvon because he was a black teenager. Am I absolutely, 100% sure of this? No, I’m not, but as I said previously mine own along with millions of other experiences of black men causes me to arrive at this conclusion. From Mr. Zimmerman’s perspective Trayvon was a suspicious character. And that dear ones is how far, far too many black men still feel and are at times treated in our society. The outrage comes from the belief of the greater African-American community that in too many instances black men are treated with suspicion simply because we are black. In most cases this treatment results in humiliation, a feeling of powerlessness and a real sense that no matter what to some we’ll always be outsiders to be regarded with suspicion and derision. And in a few cases it ends in a tragedy that causes us to immediately think ‘that could have been my son, or nephew, or brother, or father or me.

Finally dear ones as we know these aren’t easy issues to discuss. However, a tragedy like this that has gotten the attention of so many may provide an opportunity for us to witness of the gospel’s power and need in our lives, our communities and our society.

Sincerely in Christ
Pastor Lance


Thursday, March 22, 2012

REACTIONS TO INJUSTICE

[Warning: there is at least one cuss word in this article]  
 As with many people I have been both reacting to and watching the reactions of others to recent violent events, and noticing the reactions of some to the reactions of others.  It is as if on this dramatic stage of global life, where news of violence in one community seems to become our common concern, we judge not only the events but also the response of our neighbors, friends, and those we suppose are our enemies or at least  those we have chosen to despise.
    There are three specific events or tragedies on my mind as I write this essay.  The first is to the recent shooting of a 13 year old girl in my own city of Chattanooga.  Miss Keoshia Ford, who was impacted by our sports ministry last summer and sent off for a few days of Christian camp.  A few days ago she was hanging out at a neighborhood block party and a couple of cars showed up with guys displaying gang signs.  Word had gotten out that this might happen and kids started to disperse to go home.  Evidently she didn't leave fast enough and as she tried to make her way home one of the cars seemed to follow her and shots were fired.  She was shot in the head and lies up in the intensive care ward in a coma, where they wait to take out the bullets.  Keoshia is African American and she was evidently shot be an African American 17 year old young man for no apparent personal reason at all.  Just trying to get his street cred with his gang, maybe paying back another neighborhood for something that went down in his neighborhood.  There have been no protests, there have been no marches, and Al Sharpton is not coming to our city to say anything about it.
    The other event, which has received much more response is the shooting of  17 year old Trayvon Martin, an African American young man in Florida, by a white man, who was evidently engaged in some self generated vigilante work in his own neighborhood.  On the face of it it appears that this was a racist act by a person who seems somewhat paranoid of black folks in his neighborhood, and in the name of "protecting" his community did commit murder.  What made the crime more heinous was that he was not immediately arrested by the police, who evidently seem caught between the shooters claims to be a neighborhood watch person claiming self defense with a legal gun, and no ready proof of why he would shoot this young man.  The case is now with the Grand Jury, which in some places of the country is a fairly unknown concept, but is a means to finally get to justice when facts don't seem apparent on the surface.
    The reaction to this event, especially in the young African American community has been instant and intense, and in my opinion entirely out of proportion.  It is an event that confirms so much of what is supposed happens everywhere, and is tied up with all kinds of fears, resentments, and even aspirations.  If what I have said is true, that it was a racist act and was murder, then surely the event should make all of us furious and demanding of the proper and full measure of justice to be imposed.  I will return to this discussion in a moment, but there is still a third story.
    The third story has to do with the recent effort by some folks to call attention to Joseph Kony and the Lord's Resistance Army and its horrific impact on the children of Uganda especially, and those in Sudan, Congo, and the Central African Republic.  What has generated all the buzz is the recent distribution and viral effect of a short video about the history of the conflict, done in the context of a white American entitled young adult culture.
    As someone who has lived and worked in Africa, and is a fairly frequent visitor to East Africa, the LRA has been something I have known about for a long time, and as with many others have felt very frustrated that such an evil man has been allowed to continue his reign of terror for so long.  Despite some pundits ideas that there must be a legitimate reason behind such long lasting and tenacious "rebellion" the reality that almost anyone in East Africa will relate to you is that there is no legitimacy to it at all.  It is just plain evil, and maintained by one particular evil man, and one that governments seem to have been unable to bring to a stop.
    So here comes this group of young Americans, not even old "Africa hands" as some State Department and NGOs and missionaries might be, but idealistic, technologically savvy, and energetic.  Their amazing efforts and impact to raise the awareness of millions in a very short time, put pressure on politicians and thereby sway government and military policy, seems to have actually pissed some people off.  I don't know these folk at Invisible Children, but others seemed to have judged their motives, mock them, and seem to resent them.  The filmmakers may have no awareness of what cultural offense they may have caused, but there is cultural offense, even as they have meant to do good.
    The reasons behind the shooting of a young girl by gang members in a drive by, the reasons for little response by the nation to that story, the reasons behind the paranoia of the white shooter of a young black man, the reasons for such visceral anger at the event by a national black audience, the reasons for the audacity of young white adults to think they can change reality by their activism, and the resentment they have caused in Africans, African Americans and old "Africa hands" are unfortunately pretty predictable.  The historic and cultural realities in which we live make them so, and if all of us don't get a better hand on these cultural dynamics we are doomed to continue to say, do, and think irresponsible things and perpetuate them.
    I said earlier that I thought the national reaction to the shooting in Florida was out of proportion but I did not mean that it is unreasonable.  The nation ought to be angry, but it is out of proportion because it is an isolated incident though it resonates with the racial history of our country, the history of police injustice, and the history of the stereotyping of young black men, and even what I would call racial myth.  The white community doesn't respond because culturally it has inherent faith in the justice system, and the black community doesn't.
    It is out of proportion because the shooting of Miss Ford is a far more prevalent event, in almost every inner city neighborhood in our country.  It is a story that seems to be on a loop, just different days, different cities, different names.  It is far easier to demand the freedom to walk in any neighborhood wearing a hoodie without being prejudged or shot down (which is certainly a reasonable hope), than it is to demand that the illegitimate pregnancy rate be ended, that men who beget children should actually father them by marrying their mamas, that parents should always know where their children are and prevent them from getting involved in violent or dangerous behavior.
     Freedom is something we all want.  The former desire to not be suspected or shot while black is the hope of freedom while the second issue mentioned here is the corruption of it.   Freedom of sex, freedom of behavior without constraint or control, and now the freedom from censor for living that way is indeed a corruption of freedom.  The idol of freedom has engendered our immorality, our immorality has destroyed our families and our communities, and the destruction of our families has increased our violence.  A black man can't seem to walk in a neighborhood without suspicion, but far more often the violence is not happening to him by white people, it is happening to black girls and boys (sometimes very young ones) in black neighborhoods by young black men, and since it happens so often it doesn't really seem like anybody gives a damn.
    One of the problems here is that in the issue of a white man shooting a black man we think freedom is the solution,; freedom from racial violence, freedom to go where we want and dress like we want.  We also seem to think the broader community should take action to make sure such violence will not be tolerated so freedom might be maintained.  In the issue of black on black crime in the urban areas of our country constraint is the solution (or a self denial of freedom) and that is much harder to effect, or even to recognize and for which to take ownership.  At the same time there is a resistance to the idea that the black community is at fault for the violence within itself, but that outside forces create and maintain the problem.
    Some may be angry with me because they think I am blaming the black community for the violence in its midst and for a pattern of irresponsible behavior in creating children who are not parented.  Maybe my reader desires someone else to be blamed. I think to some degree that is an attack on the dignity of black folk. There can be a long list of potential scapegoats; slavery, share cropping, the history of Jim Crow and segregation, the days of lynching, police brutality, stereotyping and profiling, redlining neighborhoods, institutional racism, economic exploitation; even theories of CIA programs to spread crack cocaine.  I guess at this point in my life I don't really care who gets blamed, and much of that blame I will confess to believe is nothing but denial and passing the buck.  I do care that few seem to be getting mad enough, often enough, and especially in enough places  where it counts.
    The issue in Florida, even if covered by dozens of media outlets, spoken against by hundreds of pundits, marched against by thousands of protesters, and watched by millions will not make much difference except possibly in the prosecution of one man.  Maybe it will raise our collective consciousness about how we let our prejudices lead to such injustice.  What will make a difference in the lives of thousands of children who will be shot down, not by paranoid white men or cops, but by other children in their same neighborhood is the intervention of caring adults who will come into mentoring relationships with these children.  The absence of a father, and therefore by default the limited emotional, physical, and financial involvement of the mother, cannot be made  up by any one single adult investing one hour a month, a week, or even a class day in school, though every little bit helps.  It will take many caring adults for each child.  One reason for that is that abandonment, divorce, and poverty means there are many deficits in a child's life that must be faced, dealt with, and healed.
    As a Christian I know the power of faith, the belief in a loving and caring Heavenly Father who takes you on when your parents fail you, and the power of a new identity in the love of God.  This is my experience from the projects of Newark, New Jersey.  I also know that this love came to me in the form of caring, involved, and activist adults who sacrificed their time, money, and own family life to become involved with me.
    This leads me to the last of the three issues.  I am a bit appalled, but not surprised, when I see the attempts of some well meaning folks to do something about poverty, evil, or trouble in the world be mocked and disparaged.  This is especially so when it is cross cultural.  "Do-gooders", "well-meaners", the Americans who think they can do anything. the affluent, the mercy tourists, the dabblers in justice who can leave and forget anytime they want to do so; these people can really irritate us.  They especially bother us when they seem to be so casual about it, and get all kinds of press and glory.  It took me some years to realize how powerful the forces of envy, jealousy, and the resentment they produce can be.  There are real cultural and historical reasons for those feelings, even some deep racist ones, and we ignore them to our peril if we seek to work cross culturally.  They can jump up in our hearts, and can jump out from other people in ways that will surprise us.
    Nevertheless we need to separate the wheat from the chaff here, the bullshit from the prophetic utterance, and not despise something good even if it came about from folks we are ready not to like.  Let me state it bluntly; if the work of Invisible Children gives glory to some glory seekers who might be self-seeking ( I said, "might"), and might be done by culturally insensitive people, and makes us resent affluent, perky, white kids yet stops the killing and gets villagers in Uganda tools to fight Kony, and results in U.S. Special Forces going to help African governments so that it finally puts an and to the murderous beast, then I am grateful and won't mind a bit if from now on they are famous for it and drive around in a Bentley.
    My point, small though it might be, is to discern what really are the big problems, and to take real effective action to solve them.  That I believe will take up most of our time for what we each have left.

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

PREACHING JUSTICE

   Let's face it, preaching on the subject of justice, or on issues of justice, in a conservative evangelical congregation and denomination is a dicey affair.  Forgetting the context, preaching on justice and being true to the Bible, accurate in the social assessment, and accurate in the application are all in themselves difficult.

    We are beset with difficulties; beginning with a sound exegesis and a correct hermeneutic we then desire an absence of personal bile and vendetta, and an absence of political predilection, we seek a "just" declaration.  We are confronted at the onset with a suspicion from those who hear that the message delivered has a political agenda, and in some traditions we are bound with our confession about not interfering in the affairs of the magistrate.

  So how do we not neglect the "weightier matters of the law, like justice and mercy" (Matthew 23:23) without sometimes speaking to the State?  How do we do it without picking sides in political arguments or campaigns?  How do we do it without offending the very members who pay our salaries?  Maybe it would be better to ask, "how can we not do it without offending God?"

    Evangelicals tend to preach about moral issues, and liberals tend to preach about justice issues, and both can miss the Gospel when moralizing about any subject.  Since the 1970s Evangelicals have become more and more outspoken about public morality issues, especially that of abortion.  Abortion is both a moral and justice issue, as it turns out most moral/justice issues are when it comes to behaviors that affect another person beside oneself.  That is of course where the rub is, concerning the person-hood of an unborn child.

    So many of our issues in America are based on an individual's or a group's view of freedom.  A freedom without boundaries invariably leads to invasion of another's freedom.  It is sometimes easy to see when a person seeking pleasure without restraint might interfere with the safety or dignity of another person.  The law says if you take pleasure in seeing others suffer by hitting, beating, stabbing, or shooting them you are in violation of the law.  If you take sexual pleasure in raping or molesting them, you are in violation of the law.  There are few who would object to that, even though some in agreement would still be tempted at times to do such things.  We consistently draw boundaries against an individuals freedom in order to protect others.  An adult individual may wish to have sex with a child but his desire is not allowed, not simply because society feels it is immoral, but it is unjust for one with power to take something from someone without it.

    The same conservatives who would vigorously agree with that restraint of individual freedom may not agree that it is right to draw a boundary against someone taking advantage of another economically.  The idea that having money gives you power and poverty doesn't means that the poor are easy targets for those who wish to take the little that they have.  One present danger is that ideology often leads Christians to excuse injustice in the name of other things, such as free enterprise or even government assistance to the poor.  Both have been culprits in grinding the poor into the dust in this country.  Free enterprise without restraint says that I can loan a poor person money (who absolutely needs it) and build a system in which they can never default by enlarging that initial loan through late or missed payment penalties and upping the interest rates for late or missed payments.  This puts a person who can least afford it into a seemingly never ending spiral of larger and longer term payments. The loaner can act as it they are noble, providing a service that others won't, while deliberately planning to use the poverty of an individual to dig them deeper into a hole.  This is followed up by lobbying the legislature to make declaring bankruptcy harder if not impossible.

    The ideology of activist government in seeking to provide welfare without tools to re-capitalize the poor creates a system of character destroying dependency.  Sustaining people in poverty without building the stairs for them to climb out of it is a maze without an exit.  Ideology then defends such systems in the name of compassion and attempts to resist the accusation of injustice.

    We are speaking of preaching here, and specifically about preaching justice.  Maybe we can give some helpful ideas, but all should be approached with Biblical discernment.
    Justice is what is righteous and equitable in relationship to others.  It begins with a concept of treating others fairly, and as you would want to be treated.  The Scriptures begin this kind of idea with the Sabbath, commanding that even those who work for us also have time to rest.  The Scriptures make a big deal of fair measurements, of weights and scales being the same for all.  The Scriptures demand that the powerful, the wealthy, and those in government especially are careful to guard the rights of the poor.  Since they cannot defend themselves it is necessary for those in power to do so, while those not in authority should be ready to speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves to authority.  Justice means noticing and defending, and not being apathetic when others are mistreated, enslaved, tortured, abused, or slaughtered.

    Biblical justice doesn't give anyone a pass, if something (bad/unjust) is not happening to you but it is happening to someone else, and you do nothing about it, then the Bible holds you accountable.  In this way God demands that we be community, and not simply individuals who act as if other people's problems don't apply to us.

    Biblical justice doesn't mean the poor have more rights, or get off in court when they have sinned just because they are poor, it means their rights must be protected.  This is an emphasis because they have no defender naturally.  Supernaturally God declares himself to be their protector.  This is Biblical revelation, God's justice cutting directly against the law of natural selection.  Real justice fighting predatory practice.

    Preaching from a Reformed theological perspective means that we honor those in politics and government, and at least imagine it is possible to serve in that sphere in such a way as to glorify God.  Those who serve in political parties, who get elected, who are appointed must still keep their wits about them as they weigh political platforms, ideologies, and expediency against the Word of God.  No Christian is exempt from obeying God in order to pursue political agendas.  This includes failing to honor those in authority over us, or to pray for them.  Political rhetoric which slanders, lies, or dishonors public officials is sinful.  I would say here that listening to other do so without taking exception might also be sinful.  Telling the truth is mandated, otherwise in the name of crusading for justice we become unjust, and wicked.

   It is easy to obey the Scriptural commands about honoring those in authority when we agree with them, but that is little obedience and costs us nothing.  What happens when you have to honor Caesar, who just fed  your congregation to the lions?  This applies to preachers who preach against injustice, that we would tell the truth, that we would warn about the coming judgment of God, but that we would also demonstrate that we love our enemies and seek not only their repentance but God's mercy for them.

    Justice must be preached with some sense of disengagement from personal or political ambition.  If it is right it is right, if it is wrong it is wrong.  Our American tradition binds preachers not to push candidates or parties, but our American tradition also calls us to great moral/justice preaching.  Our people need more Biblical clarity not less.  They will always need more faith, more holiness, more knowledge of theology, but if a preacher doesn't think the Scriptures speak to current issues then he must be functionally illiterate, or else he is a blind ignoramus in matters of life.

    We must preach justice, and teach its concepts to our people, without neglecting the Gospel, without neglecting the message and ministry of reconciliation.  We must preach it boldly, no matter what opposition might arise to us on its account, but we must also preach it with humility and without grinding an ax of personal bitterness. We live in a context of avoidance of social, political, or justice issues in the church while in the context of strident rhetoric about them everywhere else.  Our people need more exposure to the prophets, and our preachers need more courage, period.